Re: [GENERAL] Postgres vs commercial products - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Herouth Maoz
Subject Re: [GENERAL] Postgres vs commercial products
Date
Msg-id l03110703b1e0c390c885@[147.233.159.109]
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [GENERAL] Postgres vs commercial products  (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-general
At 21:12 +0300 on 22/7/98, Bruce Momjian wrote:


> University Ingres was first, then commercial Ingres was a split-off.
> PostgreSQL is based on University Ingres.

Which also explains the name... Remember the old lesson in data structures
about pre-order, in-order and post-order traversal of binary trees?

Well, if you have an in-gres, then you can also have a pre-gres and a
post-gres. Pre-gres would imply that it is older, less advanced than
ingres. Hence Postgres.

QED :-)

Herouth

--
Herouth Maoz, Internet developer.
Open University of Israel - Telem project
http://telem.openu.ac.il/~herutma



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Herouth Maoz
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Re: [MIRRORS] Revamp'd Web Site...
Next
From: Herouth Maoz
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Re: [HACKERS] [Fwd: SGVLLUG Oracle and Informix on Linux]